#ProteaFire Pak vs SA

  • spartanza
  • Topic Author
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 217
  • Thanks: 34

#ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540633
Anyone watching? Amla is making it look easy. Pity De Kock ain't doing anything this WC. Very entertaining stuff!

"When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea. Thank you very much."

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82468
  • Thanks: 6445

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540639
Watching bananas in pyjamas instead

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82468
  • Thanks: 6445

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540640

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Titch
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 9397
  • Thanks: 366

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540643
That catch for Amla's dismissal was something out of the top draw..
Give everything but up!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • spartanza
  • Topic Author
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 217
  • Thanks: 34

Re: Re:#ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago - 10 years 3 months ago
#540646
Yea Titch. Gone horribly wrong quickly for South Africa...

Oh Bob, just because you can't understand cricket doesn't mean you must mock it.

"When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea. Thank you very much."
Last edit: 10 years 3 months ago by spartanza.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • TNaicker
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6803
  • Thanks: 2221

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540647
@Titch...agreed...they have a genuine wicket-keeper now rather than one of the Akmals who regularly drop catches...

SA 74/4...chasing woes resuming ?? 158 required and most of the top order gone...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82468
  • Thanks: 6445

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540650
Not hard to understand ,

hit ball with stick and run
Or
Stop ball hitting wee sticks with the bigger stick

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • TNaicker
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6803
  • Thanks: 2221

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540653
81/5...need a partnership of +-100 between De Villiers and Duminy... :(

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • kristieN
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6430
  • Thanks: 462

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540655
Let's hope de Villiers can rebuild this game with Duminy. 92/5 140 to go.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82468
  • Thanks: 6445

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540662
Eish

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • CnC 306
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 36613
  • Thanks: 7392

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540665
SA look like world champs against the crap but when they come up against class sides they fold quicker than as pack of cards

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • TNaicker
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 6803
  • Thanks: 2221

Re: #ProteaFire Pak vs SA

10 years 3 months ago
#540667
103/6...129 needed...what will this do to knock-out match-ups if Pakistan win ??

The arrogance of winning the toss and fielding knowing our difficulties with chases !! De Villiers may have faith in his abilities (in a chase) but be is over-estimating the ability of those around him... :(

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.113 seconds