Woodbine is Canadian not US

neighmaster


as for video footage i can only assume your internet is slow because its crystal clear here for me.

easy Wrote:

---

> dave
>
> so you think the UK rule is better?
>
> Every year i see horses winning races and
> interfering with other horses and because "well we
> cant be sure of what would have happened" or "the
> best horse won" for me this is unacceptable and
> AS YOU know they are currently looking at FULL
> time professional stewards.
>
> For me i like the black and white situation. Then
> mere mortals CANNOT ruin it for me


They mess up stewards inquiries in UK, but i prefer our rules to American rules.
Could you imagine American Jump Racing,that would be interesting in the stewards room..<

SirPuntalot Wrote:

---

> Watever it was its kak racing.
> The one race I back a winner,at 6/1.
> The pull an inquiry pull the win away and change
> the result.
> Utter kak,all the replays they showed no
> interference at all watsoever.
> Even the guy on teletrack says he honestly doesn't
> know wat the inq was for.
> Pathetic ,that's wat it is.
> Hope someone from teletrack or wherever reads
> this.
> No more usa or even canada racing for me.
> Eish.

You are entiled to yhour opinion - so here is mine.

1. The ruling in the US if there is interference, you lose the race; that;s the rule...
2. In the footage that they showed, the bump was clear for all to see; when you talk from your pocket, a bias will always creep in.
3. Jimmy was in the studio, and to be honest I wonder if he even watched the footage, with his comments about little plastic horses, saw no interference; if he did not see the interference, he was not looking properly.
4. The replay coming through was not a problem with the link from the USA, it was tellytrack inefficiency; the picture was perfect on my laptop.
5. I understand that most people thinks its rubbish, but there are some out there, like me, who enjoy it.

i'm sure it's not rubbish just too much racing and the night shift!!!