Kolkata
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
Winning Leap in the same race runs under new ownership...actually just an additional partner.. has to have a chance in that field
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
Titch Wrote:
> Winning Leap in the same race runs under new
> ownership...actually just an additional partner..
> has to have a chance in that field
And if the going is soft ...(tu)
> Winning Leap in the same race runs under new
> ownership...actually just an additional partner..
> has to have a chance in that field
And if the going is soft ...(tu)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Deeno
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8174
- Thanks: 483
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
This kolkata issue is actually bullshit.
What will be the reason for scratching tomorrow.
High Temperature.
Here's a better one:
DID NOT WANT TO LOAD INTO THE FLOAT
Absolute Rubbish that one could be allowed to do this. It's almost 4.00pm and still no decision.
Tarry should be banned from doing this kind of noms or any trainer for that matter,
Wants his bread buttered on both sides
And Titch hails the current bosses.
What will be the reason for scratching tomorrow.
High Temperature.
Here's a better one:
DID NOT WANT TO LOAD INTO THE FLOAT
Absolute Rubbish that one could be allowed to do this. It's almost 4.00pm and still no decision.
Tarry should be banned from doing this kind of noms or any trainer for that matter,
Wants his bread buttered on both sides
And Titch hails the current bosses.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
They not really bothered about the win, just a prep run??
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
agra Wrote:
> This kolkata issue is actually bullshit.
>
> What will be the reason for scratching tomorrow.
>
> High Temperature.
> Here's a better one:
> DID NOT WANT TO LOAD INTO THE FLOAT
>
> Absolute Rubbish that one could be allowed to do
> this. It's almost 4.00pm and still no decision.
> Tarry should be banned from doing this kind of
> noms or any trainer for that matter,
> Wants his bread buttered on both sides
>
> And Titch hails the current bosses.
You said earlier that you dont fancy the horse so what diff does it make to you??
> This kolkata issue is actually bullshit.
>
> What will be the reason for scratching tomorrow.
>
> High Temperature.
> Here's a better one:
> DID NOT WANT TO LOAD INTO THE FLOAT
>
> Absolute Rubbish that one could be allowed to do
> this. It's almost 4.00pm and still no decision.
> Tarry should be banned from doing this kind of
> noms or any trainer for that matter,
> Wants his bread buttered on both sides
>
> And Titch hails the current bosses.
You said earlier that you dont fancy the horse so what diff does it make to you??
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gregbucks
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Deeno
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8174
- Thanks: 483
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
That's not the issue Titch
It is not ethical in my book.
Could be detrimental to another trainer (horse) who might have got eliminated because of what Tarry had done.
It is not ethical in my book.
Could be detrimental to another trainer (horse) who might have got eliminated because of what Tarry had done.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
agra Wrote:
> That's not the issue Titch
> It is not ethical in my book.
> Could be detrimental to another trainer (horse)
> who might have got eliminated because of what
> Tarry had done.
Its called looking after your owner the horse will be contesting feature races and with the weather being as unpredictable as it has been in both centers I believe its understandable also considering that they are 13 and 8 horse fields no horse would have got eliminated to make way for him unless the rules have been amended ??
> That's not the issue Titch
> It is not ethical in my book.
> Could be detrimental to another trainer (horse)
> who might have got eliminated because of what
> Tarry had done.
Its called looking after your owner the horse will be contesting feature races and with the weather being as unpredictable as it has been in both centers I believe its understandable also considering that they are 13 and 8 horse fields no horse would have got eliminated to make way for him unless the rules have been amended ??
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Deeno
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8174
- Thanks: 483
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
Thanks Titch
Now officially scratched.
You had an early inkling on that.
Is it a winner ..........
Nothing to beat
Now officially scratched.
You had an early inkling on that.
Is it a winner ..........
Nothing to beat
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frodo
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 13144
- Thanks: 3040
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
As far as I am aware, when a horse is scratched, there has to be a 'valid' reason, or you are not allowed to enter this horse again for a period of (I think) 2 weeks..... now is 'have raced the afternoon at a different venue' a valid reason - I think it's probable that Mr Tarry has found another 'loophole' in the rules as they stand :

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: Re: Kolkata
12 years 8 months ago
Has nothing to beat but imo 8/10 is way too short
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blueyonder001
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1491
- Thanks: 24
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.110 seconds