Flamingo Park Monday 10/6/13

Eye is wif Englander on this one .... I believe Eye of the World will beat Jack Dan over the 1600m's ... but will battle to finish in front of Power of the Flower. Especially as lately the handy horses usually dispute the finish.

I hope Sham Racing choose today to make a comeback and take the spoils at Flamingo -D

Fifty2One Wrote:

---

> nikey Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > mr vindaloo definitely worth 2 nibbles...thanks
> > Englander
>
> I couldn't agree more, it's my one bet for today.


Lets hope guys managed to get some 16/1 this morning. (tu)

Englander on form and weight he should beat P.If this was a handicap P should carry +-54kg or 7kg less then E.To fancy P you would have a go at the guys that control MR.My opinion is that P's MR is incorrect.Would you consider P to be superior to Dennis The Menace MR 79.I don't.P holds MM and KS.the curve is Big Daddy and I would have said Karloo but riding arrangements suggest otherwise.But I rather not rely on riding arrangements as we know little of the camps plan.Can't we exclude 234589 for some reason or the other?

I am sure Bloodshot owns the 9 in race three

Ben-Hur Wrote:

---

> Englander on form and weight he should beat P.If
> this was a handicap P should carry +-54kg or 7kg
> less then E.To fancy P you would have a go at the
> guys that control MR.My opinion is that P's MR is
> incorrect.Would you consider P to be superior to
> Dennis The Menace MR 79.I don't.P holds MM and
> KS.the curve is Big Daddy and I would have said
> Karloo but riding arrangements suggest
> otherwise.But I rather not rely on riding
> arrangements as we know little of the camps
> plan.Can't we exclude 234589 for some reason or
> the other?

Thanks BH, only problem is... I take no account of MRs, don't understand them and don't want to. Have the MRs changed so much in the interim then that EOTW can overturn the 6ls? Or should it not have lost that day but did cos the MRs were "wrong"? cos purely on 1.5kgs my brain says that is not enough to make up 6ls. I am not saying EOTW won't win and I am not saying POTF will win (though that is my fancy), but on the bare facts I definitely would not be backing EOTW to win... though being from the "often hard to work out" Visser stable I might include it in a couple of doubles and trebles!

Probably looking at the wrong card again but this is how I see it, probably a n other day donating to horse feed <

Rc1 / 6;10;2;9;1
Rc2 / 3;1;2;4;10
Rc3 / 4;5;1;2;3
Rc4 / 2;14;6;9;1
Rc5 / 5;2;1;4;8
Rc6 / 7;9;4;8;2
Rc7 / 6;1;2;3;5
Rc8 / 2;10;1;3;7
Rc9 / 11;10;3;6;2

Going to try swinger first 3 selections and tri box all 5.

Have a good day guys and lassies.

I would be careful of basing anything on logic @ the big hole...<

gregbucks Wrote:

---

> I would be careful of basing anything on logic @
> the big hole...<

Most bets nowadays fall into a big hole, no need to be Kimberly

donbetright Wrote:

---

> gregbucks Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > I would be careful of basing anything on logic
> @
> > the big hole...<
>
> Most bets nowadays fall into a big hole, no need
> to be Kimberly

lol...

gregbucks Wrote:

---

> donbetright Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > gregbucks Wrote:
> >
>

---

>
> >

---

> > > I would be careful of basing anything on
> logic
> > @
> > > the big hole...<
> >
> > Most bets nowadays fall into a big hole, no
> need
> > to be Kimberly
>
> lol...

Now watch us find loads of Diamonds in the bottomless PIT today, maybe we discussed on the BUS :

Englander Wrote:

---

> Ben-Hur Wrote:
>

---

>

---

> > Englander on form and weight he should beat
> P.If
> > this was a handicap P should carry +-54kg or
> 7kg
> > less then E.To fancy P you would have a go at
> the
> > guys that control MR.My opinion is that P's MR
> is
> > incorrect.Would you consider P to be superior
> to
> > Dennis The Menace MR 79.I don't.P holds MM and
> > KS.the curve is Big Daddy and I would have said
> > Karloo but riding arrangements suggest
> > otherwise.But I rather not rely on riding
> > arrangements as we know little of the camps
> > plan.Can't we exclude 234589 for some reason or
> > the other?
>
> Thanks BH, only problem is... I take no account of
> MRs, don't understand them and don't want to. Have
> the MRs changed so much in the interim then that
> EOTW can overturn the 6ls? Or should it not have
> lost that day but did cos the MRs were "wrong"?
> cos purely on 1.5kgs my brain says that is not
> enough to make up 6ls. I am not saying EOTW won't
> win and I am not saying POTF will win (though that
> is my fancy), but on the bare facts I definitely
> would not be backing EOTW to win... though being
> from the "often hard to work out" Visser stable I
> might include it in a couple of doubles and
> trebles!


when u refer to MR I am also totally in the dark but being a pinnacle suggests this might be a determining factor.YenI is the leading jock but isn't a star bet because of the horses habit of being slow away.