Hashim Amla
- Mavourneen
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
umlilo Wrote:
> (tu)
>
>
-D
Indeed, indeed! Good fight from Pakistan but they were on the back foot from the start. Great reply from the Proteas after the first Test ... but what a shame there is no third test to decide the series.
> (tu)
>
>

Indeed, indeed! Good fight from Pakistan but they were on the back foot from the start. Great reply from the Proteas after the first Test ... but what a shame there is no third test to decide the series.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
When Pakistan have been found to be ball tampering then the world is up in arms yet Faf Du Plessis has been caught cheating and all he gets is a 50% match fee fine. In this very thread we have seen a post or two having a go at Pakistan for cheating in the past. Any comment Shrek re Du Plessis?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ShezaPunter
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
ShezaPunter Wrote:
> Sorry missed the last 2 days.
> What did faf do?
he cheated by tampering with the ball but it seems that thats ok with SA fans but imagine the uproar if it were a Pakistani who did that
> Sorry missed the last 2 days.
> What did faf do?
he cheated by tampering with the ball but it seems that thats ok with SA fans but imagine the uproar if it were a Pakistani who did that
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Flash Harry
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
typical chicken he focus on the one negative he can find you change your story more than the whore drop her pantie now take the rest please re
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
Flash Harry Wrote:
> typical chicken he focus on the one negative he
> can find you change your story more than the whore
> drop her pantie now take the rest please re
oh in your mind its just a negtive is it. So in other words you condone cheating. Just for you condone means "agree" and because you are an old man and I respect old people I will not retort to slinging mud back at you re your whore comment.
> typical chicken he focus on the one negative he
> can find you change your story more than the whore
> drop her pantie now take the rest please re
oh in your mind its just a negtive is it. So in other words you condone cheating. Just for you condone means "agree" and because you are an old man and I respect old people I will not retort to slinging mud back at you re your whore comment.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Flash Harry
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
chicken i think 99% of your comment is negative about south africa and you want the re action. all i say is why come to the south africa website to do this. go some where else where you have lot of friends who agree. it is tireing to see you whine all the time
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
i am a realist. I say what I see and believe. I support SA rugby and cricket to the hilt and it pisses me off when they play kak and lose and even more so when they dont do things the way they should be done. eg Ball tampering is wrong but yet you chose to call me out on it because I say its wrong. I dont want to fight with you as I said before I respect old men
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frodo
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 13145
- Thanks: 3045
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
Of course ball tampering is not on and Faf got fined - would be interesting to know why he would do it - at that stage the Proteas were clearly in the driving seat?
Another interesting point is the 5 run 'bonus' the Pakistanis got - is there something in the rule book which actually states this precise action - or did the umpires just sort of decide amongst themselves that a 5 run 'penalty' is applicable - and if so why not 20 runs, or 50 runs :S
Regarding the Protea's performance, Tahir was a revelation - especially in the first innings (but needs to prove that he can consistently perform at that level), and our bowlers overall did well imo; however our batting remains a concern (who knows what would have happened had the wicket-keeper held on to the catch that would have sent AB packing first ball) :
Another interesting point is the 5 run 'bonus' the Pakistanis got - is there something in the rule book which actually states this precise action - or did the umpires just sort of decide amongst themselves that a 5 run 'penalty' is applicable - and if so why not 20 runs, or 50 runs :S
Regarding the Protea's performance, Tahir was a revelation - especially in the first innings (but needs to prove that he can consistently perform at that level), and our bowlers overall did well imo; however our batting remains a concern (who knows what would have happened had the wicket-keeper held on to the catch that would have sent AB packing first ball) :

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
Frodo Wrote:
> Of course ball tampering is not on and Faf got
> fined - would be interesting to know why he would
> do it - at that stage the Proteas were clearly in
> the driving seat?
>
> Another interesting point is the 5 run 'bonus' the
> Pakistanis got - is there something in the rule
> book which actually states this precise action -
> or did the umpires just sort of decide amongst
> themselves that a 5 run 'penalty' is applicable -
> and if so why not 20 runs, or 50 runs :S
>
> Regarding the Protea's performance, Tahir was a
> revelation - especially in the first innings (but
> needs to prove that he can consistently perform at
> that level), and our bowlers overall did well imo;
> however our batting remains a concern (who knows
> what would have happened had the wicket-keeper
> held on to the catch that would have sent AB
> packing first ball) :
careful now Frodo, dont be too negative otherwise the judge and jury will be after you with great vengance and they will strike you down like a lost vipor searching for its home.
> Of course ball tampering is not on and Faf got
> fined - would be interesting to know why he would
> do it - at that stage the Proteas were clearly in
> the driving seat?
>
> Another interesting point is the 5 run 'bonus' the
> Pakistanis got - is there something in the rule
> book which actually states this precise action -
> or did the umpires just sort of decide amongst
> themselves that a 5 run 'penalty' is applicable -
> and if so why not 20 runs, or 50 runs :S
>
> Regarding the Protea's performance, Tahir was a
> revelation - especially in the first innings (but
> needs to prove that he can consistently perform at
> that level), and our bowlers overall did well imo;
> however our batting remains a concern (who knows
> what would have happened had the wicket-keeper
> held on to the catch that would have sent AB
> packing first ball) :

careful now Frodo, dont be too negative otherwise the judge and jury will be after you with great vengance and they will strike you down like a lost vipor searching for its home.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neigh
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2132
- Thanks: 442
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
I was very shocked to hear about Faf tampering with the ball. Sad day for SA cricket !! CnC that's not the way we play the game !!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CnC 306
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 36613
- Thanks: 7392
Re: Re: Hashim Amla
11 years 7 months ago
neigh Wrote:
> I was very shocked to hear about Faf tampering
> with the ball. Sad day for SA cricket !! CnC
> that's not the way we play the game !!
i know and thats why i am extremely disappointed with his actions.
> I was very shocked to hear about Faf tampering
> with the ball. Sad day for SA cricket !! CnC
> that's not the way we play the game !!
i know and thats why i am extremely disappointed with his actions.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.119 seconds