SA v Australia 3rd Test

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82521
  • Thanks: 6461

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454420
Enjoy your retirement

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • KitKat
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 1481
  • Thanks: 201

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454435
Out thought, out psyched, out played and sadly methinks........OUT!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • gg
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 410
  • Thanks: 8

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454438
TNaicker ,

I agree with what you say ,its time for a major overhall of the test team . Management included !

Its a pity that Kallis and Smith where not hyped up enough for this series to clap the Ausses :(

They needed to lead from the front for 1 last time !

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • JAMES BLOND
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454441
JAMES BLOND Wrote:
> I wonder what GS is doing in the team
> no runs, making wrong decisions about reviews
> maybe time to move on, go and raise your kids
> play cricket in the backyard, be carefull not to
> losse your wicket :)


MY WISH WAS GRANTED!!!!!!!!!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Frodo
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 13143
  • Thanks: 3040

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454444
shrek Wrote:
> Frodo Wrote:
>
>
> > So no follow-on - I think that is a mistake
> from
> > an Australian point of view - surely the less
> time
> > we have to bat in the 2nd innings the better
> for
> > us :S
>
>
> Right decision IMO. Bowlers had been out there for
> over 80 overs. Recon they will try and get a 450
> plus lead by tea and declare. No more bad weather
> predicted.


I am very happy that he did not enforce it - now it's going to be up to him to time his declaration right - if he does it too early, and leave us with say 420 to get, it is not impossible (unlikely yes) that we could still win this - had he enforced the follow-on, his 'tired' bowlers (82 overs :S) only needed to bowl 6 more - and with the Proteas' state of mind, could perhaps have picked up a wicket (or maybe two) before the close - then we would have been dead and buried - now we are very much still kicking

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Tim
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2935
  • Thanks: 324

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454445
shrek Wrote:
> Frodo Wrote:
>
>
> > So no follow-on - I think that is a mistake
> from
> > an Australian point of view - surely the less
> time
> > we have to bat in the 2nd innings the better
> for
> > us :S
>
>
> Right decision IMO. Bowlers had been out there for
> over 80 overs. Recon they will try and get a 450
> plus lead by tea and declare. No more bad weather
> predicted.

I think Clarke will be fairly positive in his declaration so probably around lunch but certainly way before tea.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • shrek
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454446
Tim Wrote:
> shrek Wrote:
>
>
> > Frodo Wrote:
> >
>
>
> >
> > > So no follow-on - I think that is a mistake
> > from
> > > an Australian point of view - surely the less
> > time
> > > we have to bat in the 2nd innings the better
> > for
> > > us :S
> >
> >
> > Right decision IMO. Bowlers had been out there
> for
> > over 80 overs. Recon they will try and get a
> 450
> > plus lead by tea and declare. No more bad
> weather
> > predicted.
>
> I think Clarke will be fairly positive in his
> declaration so probably around lunch but certainly
> way before tea.


I think even though Clarke is a positive captain this is the series decider and he will be crusified if giving SA a soft target to chase down. I believe they will bat positively and look to declare with around 40 minutes before tea, leaving SA a tough half an hour session before the break. With the half hour early start and Warner in there they should get a lead of around 430 to 450 by then. I am hoping from an SA point of view they bat until tea but can't see it happening.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Tim
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2935
  • Thanks: 324

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454455
shrek Wrote:
> Tim Wrote:
>
>
> > shrek Wrote:
> >
>
>
> >
> > > Frodo Wrote:
> > >
> >
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > > So no follow-on - I think that is a mistake
> > > from
> > > > an Australian point of view - surely the
> less
> > > time
> > > > we have to bat in the 2nd innings the
> better
> > > for
> > > > us :S
> > >
> > >
> > > Right decision IMO. Bowlers had been out
> there
> > for
> > > over 80 overs. Recon they will try and get a
> > 450
> > > plus lead by tea and declare. No more bad
> > weather
> > > predicted.
> >
> > I think Clarke will be fairly positive in his
> > declaration so probably around lunch but
> certainly
> > way before tea.
>
>
> I think even though Clarke is a positive captain
> this is the series decider and he will be
> crusified if giving SA a soft target to chase
> down. I believe they will bat positively and look
> to declare with around 40 minutes before tea,
> leaving SA a tough half an hour session before the
> break. With the half hour early start and Warner
> in there they should get a lead of around 430 to
> 450 by then. I am hoping from an SA point of view
> they bat until tea but can't see it happening.


Probably depends a bit on if Warner stays in this morning as he will really press on.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Tim
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2935
  • Thanks: 324

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454457
Declaring around lunch gives SA a chance of getting the runs , which also makes it easier for Australia to take wickets.

I think Clarke wants a result in this game and an early declaration greatly increase it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Frodo
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 13143
  • Thanks: 3040

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454467
I think the logical assumption is that Australia will try to declare some time between lunch and tea; looking it from a SA point of view, they have to try their utmost to make it as difficult as possible for the Aussies to dictate - so there aim has to be to try and take wickets - especially Warner - early on, but also we do not want to be too attacking making it easier for the Aussies to score quickly. So If I was Smith, I would go in attacking for the first half hour at least - if we do get Warner and maybe another, we will be in a better position - if we don't, well then we would be in a position that everyone expects us to be in anyway.

Then re-assess the situation and if the Aussies are around 80 or 90 with no loss, go into ultra defensive mode, making it as difficult as possible to score - and try to force Clarke to either declare with less of a lead, or later than he ideally wants - and then we have to bat and bat and bat

I still say Clarke made a mistake by not enforcing the follow-on - in the context of the match, those 25 runs they scored does not make that much of a difference to the overall situation of the match - but if they could take a wicket or two in those 6 overs, it would have made a big difference

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Contest
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 320
  • Thanks: 58

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454475
The thing with following on, there was a chance of SA getting a lead of maybe 250, which can be difficult getting on the last day.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • shrek
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Re: SA v Australia 3rd Test

11 years 3 months ago
#454477
Contest Wrote:
> The thing with following on, there was a chance of
> SA getting a lead of maybe 250, which can be
> difficult getting on the last day.


Fully agree Contest and then if SA get them 30/3 with the bowlers tails up and you find yourself trying to save the game instead of trying to win it on a wearing 5th day pitch.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.120 seconds

Contact Details

Main Office (HQ)
PO Box 40390
Moreleta Park
Pretoria
0044
+27 (0) 82 785 4357
info@africanbettingclan.com

About A.B.C.

African Betting Clan is established for the upliftment of the sports punter, who enjoys a bet on horse racing, football and other sports, enabling them to voice their views and opinions on all aspects of the sport of their choice, free of charge.

Learn More

T's & C's

The views expressed on this website are not necessarily the views held by the proprietors of the site. Therefore African Betting Clan will not be responsible for any content posted. No persons under the age of 18 years are permitted to gamble. National Responsible Gambling Programme and its toll-free number (0800 006 008)