Nice one Cyril

Prish007 wrote:

chicken n chips wrote: Table a motion of no confidence, that should do the trick

The RED Berrets have this one covered

.....no they have to withdraw theirs so that the ANC themselves can table the motion....

....howzat...caught in the slips....not.....simply took a big swipe and then fell on his wicket.... :S

'Coincidentally' Eskom's Koko resigns today....rats are running scared.

SONA = Rugby World Cup 95 - Let's hope it's genuine not early electioneering - All I know is that there seems to be a big drive to increase the prison population by the Hawks so I will support this Gov until they lose their way(I hope they don't)

mr hawaii wrote: SONA = Rugby World Cup 95 - Let's hope it's genuine not early electioneering - All I know is that there seems to be a big drive to increase the prison population by the Hawks so I will support this Gov until they lose their way(I hope they don't)

Mr H...I'm willing to put my c**k on the block and say that "CR will be the best President that AFRICA has ever seen!"

And, for the record, I am NOT an ANC supporter, and have never voted for them.

Lionel wrote:

mr hawaii wrote: SONA = Rugby World Cup 95 - Let's hope it's genuine not early electioneering - All I know is that there seems to be a big drive to increase the prison population by the Hawks so I will support this Gov until they lose their way(I hope they don't)

Mr H...I'm willing to put my c**k on the block and say that "CR will be the best President that AFRICA has ever seen!"

And, for the record, I am NOT an ANC supporter, and have never voted for them.

FFS, this is a first, I have to agree with you Lionel. When you look and then listen to him he comes across as a statesman.

By the way what is it with you durban blokes wanting to put your cocks on a block. Karma and Craig p have also said that in the past. Is it some fantasy that you all have in durban town?

chicken n chips wrote:

Lionel wrote:

mr hawaii wrote: SONA = Rugby World Cup 95 - Let's hope it's genuine not early electioneering - All I know is that there seems to be a big drive to increase the prison population by the Hawks so I will support this Gov until they lose their way(I hope they don't)

Mr H...I'm willing to put my c**k on the block and say that "CR will be the best President that AFRICA has ever seen!"

And, for the record, I am NOT an ANC supporter, and have never voted for them.

FFS, this is a first, I have to agree with you Lionel. When you look and then listen to him he comes across as a statesman.

By the way what is it with you durban blokes wanting to put your cocks on a block. Karma and Craig p have also said that in the past. Is it some fantasy that you all have in durban town?

Lol...there is first time for everything i guess CnC

Durban blokes...well, the thing is...only in Durban will you find blocks big enough :lol: :lol: :lol: :ohmy: :blush:

I am lost for words :ohmy:

Lots of positives all over social media

mr hawaii wrote:

Lionel wrote: As long as No. 1 is on point the rest will follow suit, or be found out. It's all the about the leader.
"An army of sheep led by a lion, will defeat an army of lions led by a sheep."

I hope this lion fires that Shaun The Sheep

D Day for the Sheep:

National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) Shaun Abrahams will have one final opportunity to state his case when he tries to convince the Constitutional Court that he should keep his job on Wednesday. He is appealing an earlier judgment that ruled that the removal of his predecessor, Mxolisi Nxasana, was unlawful.

In the Constitutional Court on Wednesday, Abrahams is likely to argue that this is not the case, and that his appointment is valid. Meanwhile, the Court will also hear arguments that Nxasana was an "honourable" man who should be reinstated to continue doing the job he was appointed to do.

Freedom Under Law (FUL), Corruption Watch and the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution (Casac) went to court in an effort to have Abraham's appointment set aside on the grounds that former NDPP Mxolisi Nxasana's removal was unlawful. They wanted an order reinstating him or, alternatively, stating that the office was vacant and a new NDPP should be appointed.

The High Court in Pretoria agreed with them in so far as the office was now vacant because Nxasana's removal was unlawful, but the NPA and the presidency appealed. Last week, the presidency said it would no longer appeal.

The presidency under former president Jacob Zuma contended that the court was wrong in saying that Zuma was too conflicted to decide on a new NDPP, and that his deputy, who was Cyril Ramaphosa at the time, should make the appointment.

Last week, Ramaphosa withdrew this appeal, eNCA reported. This is reportedly a strong indicator that Ramaphosa does not intend keeping Abrahams in his post, irrespective of whether the court rules that his appointment was lawful.

But the NPA still wants to appeal the ruling that Abraham's appointment is invalid.

Last week, the NPA filed papers in which it argued that Abrahams was validly appointed, as Nxasana was prepared to leave the post if fully compensated, reported News24. The NPA also argued that, because Zuma was no longer president, the issue was partly moot.

But the NPA still wants the settlement between Zuma and Nxasana set aside and for the R17.3-million to be paid back.

In an advisory issued on Tuesday, the Court explained that Zuma had appointed Nxasana from 1 October 2013. Zuma instituted a commission of inquiry into Nxasana's fitness to hold office in June 2014 following "internal conflict within the senior leadership of the NPA", and suspended him pending the outcome of the inquiry.

In August 2014, Nxasana went to court seeking to interdict his suspension. That case was never finalised because he entered negotiations with Zuma in an attempt to end their dispute. He left his position in May 2015 with a R17.3-million golden handshake.

Writing for the Daily Maverick on Wednesday, Nicole Fritz, CEO of FUL, said FUL and Corruption Watch will argue on Wednesday that Nxasana must still be reinstated. This is because not reinstating him "essentially rewards Zuma's unlawful conduct", which was his removal.

And failure to reinstate him also hurts the independence of the NPA, as it means that anyone facing dismissal proceedings can "face the charges against them and be heard".

The High Court also did not admit Nxasana's affidavit, yet made "significant" findings against him, Fritz argued.

She said Nxasana is not a "gravy-train beneficiary", but is a "whistle-blower", and "honourable man", who "resisted extraordinary pressure from the president but was eventually unlawfully forced out".

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: Zuma to go on trial :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: