A good cricket question.
- Craig Eudey
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4561
- Thanks: 559
A good cricket question.
10 years 2 months ago
Chatting to Charles Laird just now and was asked "Why in a 50 over game can a batsman be allowed to bat the whole innings and score 200 or so but the bowlers are limited to 10 overs each?".

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bayern
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 11801
- Thanks: 2608
Re: A good cricket question.
10 years 2 months ago
I think the limited overs game is all to do with runs and entertaining the public. What I mean by that, the pitch is "set-up" to favour the batsmen rather than the bowlers. It wouldn't do the limited overs game any good if a Steyn type bowler was allowed to bowl an unlimited amount of overs and the batting team was bundled out in (say) 10 to 15 overs.
Conversely, in Test cricket, the pitches favour the bowlers and the batsmen technique is tested. Here a bowler can bowl all day, provided he doesn't keel over and die from fatigue.
Economics I guess?
Conversely, in Test cricket, the pitches favour the bowlers and the batsmen technique is tested. Here a bowler can bowl all day, provided he doesn't keel over and die from fatigue.
Economics I guess?
Guessing has never been widely acclaimed as a good gambling strategy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82468
- Thanks: 6445
Re: A good cricket question.
10 years 2 months ago
I'm sure Charles wouldn't run a sprinter over 3200m 4 days in a row
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Craig Eudey
-
Topic Author
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4561
- Thanks: 559
Re: A good cricket question.
10 years 2 months ago
It is very stacked in the batsman's favour.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- shrek
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: A good cricket question.
10 years 2 months ago
You could also say a batsmen could be out first ball so a bowler can bowl 59 more balls than a batsmen faced.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mr hawaii
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 20062
- Thanks: 2653
Re: A good cricket question.
10 years 2 months agoCraig Eudey wrote: It is very stacked in the batsman's favour.
I am certain the reason is based of fan satisfaction. You can only have 10 outs per innings while each batsman has the ability to hit boundaries as he likes, which involves the crowds - Imagine if Tahir could have bowled 20 overs - The game would be dominated by slow containing bowlers and excitement would drop to zip- Spectators game that gets women and men( Black South African men) to watch who would never have bothered before - GC is doing a similar thing soon with Racing and I think that will work too. I live really close to Willowmore park and most days when there is a long version of the Game the place is empty. I think a winning formula that does not need changing.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Craig Eudey
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mickeyblue
-
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 336
- Thanks: 82
Re: A good cricket question.
10 years 2 months ago
Willowmore Park isn't quiet, it's deserted. Barring the teams there are maybe three of us journos in the press box, two scorers, a caterer and security guard at the games. :lol: :lol:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Farawaysaint
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1575
- Thanks: 164
Re: A good cricket question.
10 years 2 months ago
At this moment in time you have to have basically 5 bowlers to complete an innings.
If you took that rule away ,would you not have teams loaded with extra batsmen?
If you took that rule away ,would you not have teams loaded with extra batsmen?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.115 seconds