Universal Interference Rule

www.ifhaonline.org/default.asp?section=Resources&story=992


The Executive Council of the International Federation of Horseracing Authorities (IFHA) today unanimously approved a change to its International Agreement on Breeding, Racing and Wagering (IABRW), as recommended by its International Harmonisation of Raceday Rules Committee (IHRRC), to establish a model interference rule.

"Achieving greater uniformity in raceday rules is important to the development of an international fanbase, and it has been identified as essential to the simulcasting and commingling arrangements which are increasingly significant for the revenues of the sport,” stated Louis Romanet, Chairman of the IFHA. “The inclusion in the International Agreement of this Model Rule on deciding protests/objections represents a significant achievement in the IFHA's quest for major racing rules to be harmonised across all member countries."

Since its inception the IHRRC has worked towards achieving a harmonised approach across all major racing jurisdiction relating to deciding protests/objections.

Today the IFHA Executive Council unanimously adopted the IHRRC’s recommendation to add to the IABRW the following model rule on deciding protests/objections:

If, in the opinion of the Staging Authority’s relevant judicial body, a horse or its rider causes interference and finishes in front of the horse interfered with but irrespective of the incident(s) the sufferer would not have finished ahead of the horse causing the interference, the judge’s placings will remain unaltered.

If, in the opinion of the Staging Authority’s relevant judicial body, a horse or its rider causes interference and finishes in front of the horse interfered with and if not for the incident(s) the sufferer would have finished ahead of the horse causing the interference, the interferer will be placed immediately behind the sufferer.

Racing Authorities may, within their Rules, provide for the disqualification of a horse from a race in circumstances in which the Staging Authority’s relevant judicial body deems that the rider has ridden in a dangerous manner.

I gather this only involves horses running in the places ?

It could be interesting, sure we will have a real example soon .

I guess the interpretation " would have finished in front if not received interference"

An extreme example

The race starts and a 20/1 shot crosses over the 1/5 and nearly brings it to its feet and basically gets pulled up, the 20/1 shot wins race and is then placed last and the hottie 2nd last
The race is awarded to the 50/1 that run second
I guess that disqualification also would have been an option ?

However lets wait and see in a live situation, what do we do currently in SA ?

Thanks Naresh...once again an interesting post...