Hollywoodbets

As pointed out by Naresh it's not only Hollywood it's all the bookies world wide.
Let's hope Dev can give us an explanation on why this happens.

Are the people on this thread sure that all bookies offer less than the 11/1 anytime goalscorer in a bet builder? It can never be correct, your double should have a reduction but it can't be less than that price

Sorry for late reply but just read the detail .

Bottom line is that the payout can't be correct .

I have found that if the anytime goal scorer is short and you add his team to win you get better odds.
But if the scorer is longer odds then you get worse odds than him just scoring without his team winning.
Here is an example of of tonights game Spurs vs Everton......

Kane to score 1.1
Spurs to win 0.6
Matchbuilder odds for that is 2.12 so you do get better odds

Reguilon to score 12
Spurs to win 0.6
Matchbuilder odds for that is 8.51 so you get worse by adding Spurs to win

They catching you here as it just doesn't make logical sense to take that bet.
Dev please inform us why this happens.I have asked before but you never replied.

Take a scorecast durbs that is first goal scorer and final score. Yesterday I had de Bruyne to score first and City to win 5-1 Just missed out.

CnC 306 wrote:

Take a scorecast durbs that is first goal scorer and final score. Yesterday I had de Bruyne to score first and City to win 5-1 Just missed out.

I keep away from any matchbuilder bets Cnc.
But the thing we want any bookie to explain to us is why when taking a matchbuilder with an anytime scorer that is 12-1 if you add his team to win you suddenly get worse odds of 8.5-1
There has got to be some sort of reason for it but not sure even the bookies know what it is so they say nothing as it's better for them to just keep silent and hope we forget about this.

Hi Everyone

Apologies for the delayed response. Please see response from the team:

The very simple explanation of the clients bet is firstly he could not have taken that bet Pre-Match as it’s a related bet.

So for the client to take bet Pre-Match he had to split his stake of R200 into two single bets
• Pre-Match - Maguire to score anytime @11/1 which will be now 1100/100 with the split stake
• Pre-Match - Man U to win @ 13/20 which now be 65/100 with the split stake
• Pre-Match - Final pay-out if both won will be 1165/200
• The Betbuilder returned 1442/200 at 7.21/1 odds as both legs won

Client gained R277 by taking the Bet Builder bet

I hope this clears things up.

Devin

Reguilon to score 12
Spurs to win 0.6
Matchbuilder odds for that is 8.51 so you get worse by adding Spurs to win

Can you explain the above please Dev as I got this from your site this morning and tell me why I must take 8.5-1 when on it's own,without taking a bigger risk,it's 12-1?

And remember there is no splitting the bet as if one loses then your whole bet loses

We don't care about spliting this and that,what we want to know is who in their right mind would add a risk to get a worse price?
If the punter didn't see the odds of 12-1 for Reguilon to score anytime he probably would have thought taking him to score and Spurs to win would get him a better price,and rightly so

That is what we want explained Dev

Dev your response makes sense, if it was indeed not possible to take the double pre match. We have here a case where the user seemingly did find a way to take the bet pre match? So then the explanation from your team is of a totally different scenario.