Piere Strydom pack your bags
- mikesack
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3348
- Thanks: 201
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
For the benefit of the punters who are not aware jockey P.S. has been banned years ago for a ride in zBloem think it was trainer D Renou's horse.
He was given a few months, think the story is in Sporting pOst sands of time.
However in this incident Imvho he was MIzSLED by the commentator calling the horse home and hosed and it was a genuine unfortunate mistake.
Let's give the benefit of the doubt and move on. NK must be given a VERBAL Warning. :lol:
He was given a few months, think the story is in Sporting pOst sands of time.
However in this incident Imvho he was MIzSLED by the commentator calling the horse home and hosed and it was a genuine unfortunate mistake.
Let's give the benefit of the doubt and move on. NK must be given a VERBAL Warning. :lol:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neigh
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2132
- Thanks: 442
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
Err in judgement (what ever the reason) = mistake = breaking rules = punishment.
Striker cant do more than acknowledge his bad judgement/breaking the rules and taking his punishment. Owners, punters, trainer have to accept this and move on, its past tense, nothing will change the result.
Hopefully the punishment will = the transgression. End of story !
Striker cant do more than acknowledge his bad judgement/breaking the rules and taking his punishment. Owners, punters, trainer have to accept this and move on, its past tense, nothing will change the result.
Hopefully the punishment will = the transgression. End of story !
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82524
- Thanks: 6461
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months agoTitch wrote:Care to elaborate??Bob Brogan wrote: Very unfair to Tellina Titch considering your past at handling that FARMER :whistle:
Bit of banter RE the Carl Burger winning ways show
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
Thought that is what it was but cant see the connection...My point is simple If telina is genuinely of the opinion that the "game is rotten" then he should simply walk away from it...
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82524
- Thanks: 6461
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months agoROBERT BLOOMBERG wrote: Hi Bob
In answering your question and to correct a few erroneous posts, I was contacted by Strydom and he has elected to utilise the services of Adv Manny Witz as he is a “family friend.”
The likelihood is that PS will be charged with Rule 62.2.3 which states that: “the rider of a horse shall ride his horse out to the end of a race.” The Guidelines usually followed for this contravention is 3:2:2:1 where your actions cost you 1st,2nd,3rd or 4th place. In other words, PS will probably get a 3 month suspension.
Then the mitigating factors in respect of sentence come into play i.e. the influence the commentator may have had on him, the fact that his view was blocked by 2 other horses on his inside so he never saw the winner, that this was a genuine error, his contriteness and acceptance of guilt and his impeccable record over many years particularly in terms of this Rule.
Precedents in previous matters are also of extreme importance, but on the flipside, you cannot equate dropping your hand a stride or two before the posts and doing so some 50m out and this was one of the worst I’ve seen in many years.
In my opinion taking all the factors into account, the likelihood is that he will get 6 weeks suspended and will therefore get a net suspension of 6 weeks. Having said that, I once acted for Marthinus Mienie who received the customary 3 month suspension and after 2 Appeals as the 1st led to an Inquiry de novo he ended up with a net R25k fine, but then he did have numerous mitigating factors in regard to his ride.
Thanks for the comments
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82524
- Thanks: 6461
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
When handing out punishments do the NHRA take into account of the Jocks popularity ?
A mistake like this from a punters FAV like Striker or Marcus must be of bigger consequence than if it was a Donut that had made the error ?
A mistake like this from a punters FAV like Striker or Marcus must be of bigger consequence than if it was a Donut that had made the error ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Over the Air
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2948
- Thanks: 721
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
I was shocked to be informed of the following that appeared in the stipes reports of 20 August, a few days before the incident. This occurred in the 3rd race.
c) Jockey P Strydom appeared before the Board with regards to his riding of PRIDE IN BATTLE and was advised to ride with sufficient vigour and determination as to leave no room for query from the Stewards.
Based on this, I believe the stipes will have no option but to give him a proper holiday, and to be frank, he richly deserves it. My sympathy for his error has now diminished totally. He is not bigger than the game.
c) Jockey P Strydom appeared before the Board with regards to his riding of PRIDE IN BATTLE and was advised to ride with sufficient vigour and determination as to leave no room for query from the Stewards.
Based on this, I believe the stipes will have no option but to give him a proper holiday, and to be frank, he richly deserves it. My sympathy for his error has now diminished totally. He is not bigger than the game.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago - 9 years 9 months ago
How the commentator can be held accountable in ANY way is beyond me :S :S The fact that there has been such an uproar and that a 3 month suspension is being discussed as a possible punishment should surely show that everyone who watched the race was of the opinion that Striker should have won and had we been asked to predict the winner 50m from the line we all would have selected Dublin Rebel without exception...the fact that Nico called it as he (and everyone else) saw it is what one should expect from a race caller, so why , with the benefit of hindsight should he be blamed for something that was completely out of his hands...
Give everything but up!
Last edit: 9 years 9 months ago by Titch.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82524
- Thanks: 6461
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months agoTitch wrote: How the commentator can be held accountable in ANY way is beyond me :S :S The fact that there has been such an uproar and that a 3 month suspension is being discussed as a possible punishment should surely show that everyone who watched the race was of the opinion that Striker should have won and had we been asked to predict the winner 50m from the line we all would have selected Dublin Rebel without exception...the fact that Nico called it as he (and everyone else) saw it is what one should expect from a race caller, so why , with the benefit of hindsight should he be blamed for something that was completely out of his hands...
Comment from Rob was tongue in cheek imo ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Shield
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago
titch don't be a hypocrite
we never forget what happened at Fairview with the first timer and lerena
very clean this game
we never forget what happened at Fairview with the first timer and lerena
very clean this game
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Titch
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 9397
- Thanks: 366
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months agoWasnt refering to Rob's comment H, there was a discussion on FB that claims NK was to blame which I could not for the life of me grasp...Bob Brogan wrote: Comment from Rob was tongue in cheek imo ?
Give everything but up!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
Topic Author
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 82524
- Thanks: 6461
Re: That has to be a 3 month ban
9 years 9 months ago - 9 years 9 months agoTitch wrote:Wasnt refering to Rob's comment H, there was a discussion on FB that claims NK was to blame which I could not for the life of me grasp...Bob Brogan wrote: Comment from Rob was tongue in cheek imo ?
Some of the stuff posted on Facebook has been disgusting, I mainly just share stuff these days on there .
Facebook has run its course since the started hiding pages from timelines
Last edit: 9 years 9 months ago by Bob Brogan.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.120 seconds