Vaal Tuesday

Race 8 Boxed Quartet: 1,4,6,11,14

Fixed Win

HORSE RACING > VAAL
Race 8 08-Dec-2015 17:40
#11 OCULUS
Price: 7.69 Stake:
Potential Payout: 3846.15
Min. stake: 1.00

Frodo .........what an ARM..............contact me in future................

Countrymember wrote: Fixed Win

HORSE RACING > VAAL
Race 8 08-Dec-2015 17:40
#11 OCULUS
Price: 7.69 Stake:
Potential Payout: 3846.15
Min. stake: 1.00

Frodo .........what an ARM..............contact me in future................

Nice one CM

Luckily I'm learning my lesson slowly - covered on the places on Gambol - for a second there I thought I picked a winner :ohmy:

Next challenge is (well apart from figuring out those BAMRALs ) back the places to make a profit and cover on the wins - and not the other way around - why is that so darn difficult :huh:

Loopy Logic wrote: an "open affair could very easily be a "BUMRAL" CM

This is NOT a betting proposition for me hence I have 1,13,9,4,8,14,7,11,
in my pa

Ok, see the trail starting for the reason why I stopped posting months ago ..... ll the best good luck guys hope these guys find you all the winners

Loopy ,as you know, I believe that a "non-subjective " rating system is the best basis for establishing foundation selections ,per race(I use one of my own)
For that reason ,I have never attacked your system and have watched its results with interest!
If I may offer an opinion though, my problem is that the ratings include too many areas of comparison (Bamrals,etc etc) which actually give too many "possibles results".
Its impractical(and too expensive) for punters to apply them all.
(a criticism could also be ,that with so many "possibles", there is a high chance of retrospective claimed accuracy.)
I think that better credibility requires weighting all those factors to reduce them to more committed predictions!
This is just my opinion and it is meant as positive criticism!

rob faux wrote:

Loopy Logic wrote: an "open affair could very easily be a "BUMRAL" CM

This is NOT a betting proposition for me hence I have 1,13,9,4,8,14,7,11,
in my pa

Ok, see the trail starting for the reason why I stopped posting months ago ..... ll the best good luck guys hope these guys find you all the winners

Loopy ,as you know, I believe that a "non-subjective " rating system is the best basis for establishing foundation selections ,per race(I use one of my own)
For that reason ,I have never attacked your system and have watched its results with interest!
If I may offer an opinion though, my problem is that the ratings include too many areas of comparison (Bamrals,etc etc) which actually give too many "possibles results".
Its impractical(and too expensive) for punters to apply them all.
(a criticism could also be ,that with so many "possibles", there is a high chance of retrospective claimed accuracy.)
I think that better credibility requires weighting all those factors to reduce them to more committed predictions!
This is just my opinion and it is meant as positive criticism!

10 out of 10 for diplomacy

Apologies, I thought it was quite simply ,

You read from the top to the bottom per race...

Seriously though what you see is all the indicators but they are already weighted hence when you filter by a race you will see them rated from top to bottom

Thanks for the comments Frodo,

If you do read the ratings explained once you would understand the indicators MUCH better , however if you not into reading just going from top to bottom works best for those that does not want to put in a little bit of effort .. that is how they are rated overall ... top to bottom

We don't see them as "possible results" rather as reasons why they could also feature however the ratings has already ranked them from top to bottom, once you know the results though at least you can construct your own reasoning why a specific horse featured and there are MANY that has no chance based on not being picked up by any of the indicators... knowledge is power after all ... you just need to put in some effort if you want to improve imo ... and those indicators are used when selecting exotics hence why we picked up a 12/1 Bipot and 20/1 PA yesterday

There is NOTHING better than this ratings system out there... or at least I have not seen it,