Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

  • khargisland
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 216
  • Thanks: 28

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#712871
oscar wrote: My only comment on this and the HHRA. When I and a few Indian Drs in Durban applied for colors to race horses.. the amount of paperwork we had to provide was huge.. however we had so much love for the game that we did it.. then came the interviews in the boardroom which checked what our jobs were , where we lived the lot, talk about FICA today this was FICA on steroids.. we did it , one of my great friends who is now a highly esteemed Professor of Medicine was interviewed for over 2 hours.. after that by the way the authorities then allowed you colors for maybe one horse or two horses or a % of one horse.

I accept times have changed and anybody can now go and get colors for 200 horses with one application form. However with that comes problems.. all trainers want new owners but cry when they don't pay their bills.. the authorities want new owners but don't interve when bills related to training, transport, vet etc bills are not paid... why not?

I remember my own interview in 1987. It was a nightmare. Anyway, it was to be a part of the sport that made for a fond memory.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Sammy Silver
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4617
  • Thanks: 1079

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#712873
Do you guys have any feedback on Van Vuuren's wife and how she is doing after his death?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pirates
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#712875
Sammy Silver wrote: Do you guys have any feedback on Van Vuuren's wife and how she is doing after his death?
very badly

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • louisg
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanks: 682

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#712937
OTA , with regard to your earlier post, I see that the facts are confusing and frustrating you....

The point is that it is the fact that NHRA are NOT FLEXIBLE, which is allowing things to carry on as they are. They are sticking to their rules exactly and rigidly. MJ is no longer a member of NHRA and has resigned from the Company and has also handed in his own colours. As far as Racing is concerned he is gone.

So, whilst you state that I cannot see the wood from the trees, I obviously do not agree with that, but I must concede that I do not have your colourful vision, which sees red and nothing else....not even the facts.
The following user(s) said Thank You: CnC 306

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • louisg
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanks: 682

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#712988
Warren
1)A change of Ownership can be done after Acceptances but before race time, where it will be published later and will be clearly stated, "sold with engagement". Happens often. No rules were bent at all.

2)Reef of Fortune - please tell ! ( out with it man, dont hide behind little cryptic clues and innuendos)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Warren Laird
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#713026
LG
Everything you have said about the NHA I totally agree with . There hands are not tired there is not much that they can do in the current situation.

Thank you for the correction to the procedure of the COC , however one can not accept that all the correct paper work was done in time , during negotiations on so many horses and various parties and that was OTA's opinion . It has come and gone so I will leave it there.

As to my chirp , that could have been avoided and was not necessary in hind site .But that is just me putting my thoughts on paper.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Over the Air
  • Topic Author
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 2948
  • Thanks: 721

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago - 7 years 4 months ago
#713072
louisg wrote: OTA , with regard to your earlier post, I see that the facts are confusing and frustrating you....

The point is that it is the fact that NHRA are NOT FLEXIBLE, which is allowing things to carry on as they are. They are sticking to their rules exactly and rigidly. MJ is no longer a member of NHRA and has resigned from the Company and has also handed in his own colours. As far as Racing is concerned he is gone.

So, whilst you state that I cannot see the wood from the trees, I obviously do not agree with that, but I must concede that I do not have your colourful vision, which sees red and nothing else....not even the facts.

Louis if anyone is confused and irritated it must be you. It certainly isn't me. You quite correctly say that the NHRA are NOT FLEXIBLE ( or should not be ). Let me refer back to my original post and use one of the horses raced in partnership but carded to wear the Mayfair colours on the day:

The "INFLEXIBLE" NHA rules state that:

8.5.1 A HORSE owned in partnership shall be raced in partnership COLOURS or in the COLOURS of the individual partner specified in the application to REGISTER the partnership of the HORSE concerned.

So in effect, a horse that changes owners, loses or gains an owner in a partnership, or races in "new" colours should be subject to the standard change of ownership rules.

Using the horse TEVEZ as an example, and there are more, this horse raced in the partnership of Mayfair, Shirtliff and Ressell. The colours it raced in were Mayfair colours. For the Met race day, with all the Barends' shenanigans and pacifying of COSATU and PSA, the following was recorded in the stipes report:

RACE CARD CHANGES / OTHER:

a) TEVEZ (A Domeyer) – Ownership unchanged. Colours: White and blue halved horizontally, pink sleeves, blue cap.


The change recorded thus that the same owners were in the horse, but now instead of the usual Mayfair colours it raced in Shirtliffs colours. One of a few such "mayfairs" on the day.

Nowhere in the NHA registration and changes weekly reports, both prior to this raceday and after, does this change reflect. In effect this change has never been officially approved and documented as such.

Let's be having you Louis, I love debating with someone who does not know what he's talking about. I trust your understanding now extends to multi-colour status and not just the alleged red. LMFAO
Last edit: 7 years 4 months ago by Over the Air.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Felix
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 1129
  • Thanks: 304

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#713077
News 24 report-Mayfair Speculators refusing to repay Investec, a R 250 million loan taken in late November 2017 :ohmy:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Bob Brogan
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 82524
  • Thanks: 6461

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#713079
Felix wrote: News 24 report-Mayfair Speculators refusing to repay Investec, a R 250 million loan taken in late November 2017 :ohmy:

From the other thread

Investec's Bernard Kantor caught in Steinhoff headlights m.fin24.com/Companies/Retail/investecs-b...-headlights-20180209

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Felix
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 1129
  • Thanks: 304

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#713080
Bob Brogan wrote:
Felix wrote: News 24 report-Mayfair Speculators refusing to repay Investec, a R 250 million loan taken in late November 2017 :ohmy:

From the other thread

Investec's Bernard Kantor caught in Steinhoff headlights m.fin24.com/Companies/Retail/investecs-b...-headlights-20180209

Apologies seen it now

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Sylvester
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 13994
  • Thanks: 1422

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago
#713083
In my honest opinion all MAYFAIR horses partnership or not should be prevented from racing, until sold to another owner or retired. for SA RACING to have any association with MAYFAIR will bring further scrutiny to SA RACING in the future. Klavervlei and CTS similarly need to very quickly resolve their association with MAYFAIR or also be stripped of the privilege of doing business with NHA.

SA RACING image is being further tarnished by playing nice with MAYFAIR.

If the EFF or one of the big unions suggest a boycott of TAB beacuse of this mess racing will be FCUK'ed good and proper.

shortsighted to allow MAYFAIR status Quo
The following user(s) said Thank You: Muhtiman, mr hawaii, the fantasy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Urbanite
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 196
  • Thanks: 54

Re: Are the NHA acting with integrity wrt Mayfair/MJ?

7 years 4 months ago - 7 years 4 months ago
#713091
Over the Air wrote:
louisg wrote: OTA , with regard to your earlier post, I see that the facts are confusing and frustrating you....

The point is that it is the fact that NHRA are NOT FLEXIBLE, which is allowing things to carry on as they are. They are sticking to their rules exactly and rigidly. MJ is no longer a member of NHRA and has resigned from the Company and has also handed in his own colours. As far as Racing is concerned he is gone.

So, whilst you state that I cannot see the wood from the trees, I obviously do not agree with that, but I must concede that I do not have your colourful vision, which sees red and nothing else....not even the facts.


Louis if anyone is confused and irritated it must be you. It certainly isn't me. You quite correctly say that the NHRA are NOT FLEXIBLE ( or should not be ). Let me refer back to my original post and use one of the horses raced in partnership but carded to wear the Mayfair colours on the day:

The "INFLEXIBLE" NHA rules state that:

8.5.1 A HORSE owned in partnership shall be raced in partnership COLOURS or in the COLOURS of the individual partner specified in the application to REGISTER the partnership of the HORSE concerned.

So in effect, a horse that changes owners, loses or gains an owner in a partnership, or races in "new" colours should be subject to the standard change of ownership rules.

Using the horse TEVEZ as an example, and there are more, this horse raced in the partnership of Mayfair, Shirtliff and Ressell. The colours it raced in were Mayfair colours. For the Met race day, with all the Barends' shenanigans and pacifying of COSATU and PSA, the following was recorded in the stipes report:

RACE CARD CHANGES / OTHER:

a) TEVEZ (A Domeyer) – Ownership unchanged. Colours: White and blue halved horizontally, pink sleeves, blue cap.


The change recorded thus that the same owners were in the horse, but now instead of the usual Mayfair colours it raced in Shirtliffs colours. One of a few such "mayfairs" on the day.

Nowhere in the NHA registration and changes weekly reports, both prior to this raceday and after, does this change reflect. In effect this change has never been officially approved and documented as such.

Let's be having you Louis, I love debating with someone who does not know what he's talking about. I trust your understanding now extends to multi-colour status and not just the alleged red. LMFAO

It's quite clear from the facts put out by Over the Air that the NHA is breaching its own rules in bending over backwards to accommodate Mayfair and Jooste.
The question is, who is going to bring the NHA to book or can anyone hold them accountable for bringing horseracing into disrepute ?
Has the NHA now disqualified itself from enforcing its own rules by these breaches ?
How can the NHA now sanction a member for breaching the rules if they themselves cannot uphold them ? Two wrongs don't make a right and while i am no law man, what if a member brings this up as a defence ?
Last edit: 7 years 4 months ago by Urbanite. Reason: duplicate

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.135 seconds

Contact Details

Main Office (HQ)
PO Box 40390
Moreleta Park
Pretoria
0044
+27 (0) 82 785 4357
info@africanbettingclan.com

About A.B.C.

African Betting Clan is established for the upliftment of the sports punter, who enjoys a bet on horse racing, football and other sports, enabling them to voice their views and opinions on all aspects of the sport of their choice, free of charge.

Learn More

T's & C's

The views expressed on this website are not necessarily the views held by the proprietors of the site. Therefore African Betting Clan will not be responsible for any content posted. No persons under the age of 18 years are permitted to gamble. National Responsible Gambling Programme and its toll-free number (0800 006 008)