protecting the image of racing

  • TheBluntPunt
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago
#613257
the claws are out tonight fellas. meeeeow.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • louisg
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 1766
  • Thanks: 682

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago
#613262
Yes, Englander, the info is easily accessible on the gallop site. Just click on card changes and read the reasons why horses are scratched for each meeting

Coughing, nasal discharge, temperature, mucus in trachea, not eating up etc.

Those are the horses that showed symptoms AFTER acceptances. The other sick horses are not nominated. Others that develop symptoms between date of noms and acceptances are not accepted to run.
The problem with virus is that there is no way of predicting which horse will and which horse won't be infected. No Trainer knows that.
All that can be found out is who has horses with virus and who does not.
That info is on gallop.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Englander

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Dean321
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 4465
  • Thanks: 466

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago
#613264
You raise valid concerns Engels and make valid points. I have read your responses three times over and it has been perfectly said.

Just something I would like to add- there might possibly be 29 members that are not happy with the result or maybe just maybe concerned as to what this does to the image of racing. .... remember 29 people may post however the thread is read by thousands whom just chose not to respond and rather make their own conclusion.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Englander

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • johnnycomelately
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3211
  • Thanks: 295

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago
#613268
Thank you Dean321
I would add that most of us do not reply [me for one] simply because we agree/disagree with what has already been said and feel it's better to follow the views of the learned/informed posters?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • rob faux
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago
#613269
Mister a, those were the punters golden days of race figures.......the difference between that and MR is like chalk and cheese .........opportunities still exist but far less frequently.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • johnnycomelately
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 3211
  • Thanks: 295

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago
#613270
And not as easy to spot now

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mister a
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 850
  • Thanks: 146

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago
#613272
rob faux wrote: Mister a, those were the punters golden days of race figures.......the difference between that and MR is like chalk and cheese .........opportunities still exist but far less frequently.

still plenty, patience is the key for bigger bets, the notes and watchlist can really help you, make them after every meeting when facts are fresh in your mind, also the trainers stats must be followed closely, i only punted big money on certain trainers, the trick is to know which trainer can bring his horse to the course the way he did last time, the trainers stats must be followed closely, i knew through careful study which trainers paid much attention to detail and relied on their professionalism to know they would not run a horse who was not 100% spot on that day, especially when the horse had showed the signs that he was ready, also remember if the handicappers job is to equalize the runners chances then when he makes an error he make a good thing of something, FZ is currently on a run with 9 from 9, ,

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mister a
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 850
  • Thanks: 146

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago
#613275
TheBluntPunt wrote:
mister a wrote: this post is written for no other purpose than to share with racegoers on ABC what can be achieved with form study and form study alone, absolutely no information, in the mid 90s I got very serious about punting and my rule no 1 to 10 was "block your ears" which meant that I did not want to hear anything anyone had to say about any horse in any race, so much so that I banned any chat about any race in my circle, I chose all the horses except two, one was selected by FZ and the other by my good friend Gerard, we sat at table 13 at Bruma Tattersalls and punted with the 13 or so big bookmakers that operated from there, we used an investor who gave 30k as an upfront fee for the first tip and he had 40k on the first bet at 9/2 at Bruma and 40k on out of town, the second bet was 200k on a 11/2 shot which we got on for him at Bruma and he got 200k on out of town, the third bet was to win over a bar and a well meaning friend who had seen our tickets was an owner in the trainers yard of the horse we had backed, he phoned the trainer who advised me over the phone to cancel the bet as the horse was out for a run in a sprint far too short for him and he was aimed at a mile race in a few weeks time, I let the bet ride because I had done my homework and the horse won easily, we had no problem getting on in the early stages of the big punting, we got our bets on with all the bookmakers and only went down to place the bets after the canter down, then as time went on some of the bookmakers would not lay to us anymore, we were getting 400 to 600k on a horse and our investor was also punting these horses with out of town bookies, I waited for certainties at around 5/1, we hit about 12 times after that and won over 2 bar on some of the horses, we got to the unusual stage of having to reduce ticket amounts after horses had won in order to help the bookies to settle us, our bets were on at 5/1, 4/1 or 7/2 and by the time the bookies took back the horses were 15/10 or shorter, the 2nd last punt we had as a team was a 9/2 horse selected by my associate FZ, one bookie took a chance and layed the entire bet to us after phoning the owner a fellow bookie who confirmed "the horse could not win", the luckless bookie had to settle us with a series of PD cheques over a long time period because he had not taken back due to the inside info, around that time i was hijacked one Monday and was told orders were to take me to a township, I was lucky to get away, the following Monday one of my circle MH was shot at point blank range, he put his hand in front of his face just in time to deflect the bullet through his thumb and into his shoulder, he was also lucky, we dont know if it was punting related but I made my decision and left racing for many years, MH stayed in the game, in 2005 I put Formgrids on the internet to share the wonderful tool with racing, my success was due to an understanding of handicapping, understanding the WFA scale and my own interpretation of it and a combo of Computaform and Formgrids and off course blocking my ears.

give us a winner then

sometimes i give two
www.formgrids.com/c_racing-news-item.asp...m=2016-03-28+13%3a31
The following user(s) said Thank You: TheBluntPunt

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • rob faux
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Thanks: 0

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago - 9 years 1 month ago
#613277
mister a wrote:
rob faux wrote: Mister a, those were the punters golden days of race figures.......the difference between that and MR is like chalk and cheese .........opportunities still exist but far less frequently.

still plenty, patience is the key for bigger bets, the notes and watchlist can really help you, make them after every meeting when facts are fresh in your mind, also the trainers stats must be followed closely, i only punted big money on certain trainers, the trick is to know which trainer can bring his horse to the course the way he did last time, the trainers stats must be followed closely, i knew through careful study which trainers paid much attention to detail and relied on their professionalism to know they would not run a horse who was not 100% spot on that day, especially when the horse had showed the signs that he was ready, also remember if the handicappers job is to equalize the runners chances then when he makes an error he make a good thing of something, FZ is currently on a run with 9 from 9,
,

Absolutely -I think one of the main reasons the amount of winning punters is few is that so many try to swim upstream .....they feel compelled to try and defy the odds rather than let them work in their favor.
A perfect example is you will read on the site people who resent the strike rate of Marcus ,and want to back against him on principle-if you filter Marcus rides,using patterns,you can get his strike rate up to over 40%.
So in certain races you have a 40% chance of backing the winner so why try to find a winner amongst the balance where the other 60% chance is spread over as many as 15 horses, so your chances reduce to less than 5%.
The same principles apply to stables, draws etc ......it is folly trying to catch the exceptions right in a lot if races!
Last edit: 9 years 1 month ago by rob faux.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mister a
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 850
  • Thanks: 146

Re: protecting the image of racing

9 years 1 month ago
#613282
rob faux wrote:
mister a wrote:
rob faux wrote: Mister a, those were the punters golden days of race figures.......the difference between that and MR is like chalk and cheese .........opportunities still exist but far less frequently.

still plenty, patience is the key for bigger bets, the notes and watchlist can really help you, make them after every meeting when facts are fresh in your mind, also the trainers stats must be followed closely, i only punted big money on certain trainers, the trick is to know which trainer can bring his horse to the course the way he did last time, the trainers stats must be followed closely, i knew through careful study which trainers paid much attention to detail and relied on their professionalism to know they would not run a horse who was not 100% spot on that day, especially when the horse had showed the signs that he was ready, also remember if the handicappers job is to equalize the runners chances then when he makes an error he make a good thing of something, FZ is currently on a run with 9 from 9,
,

Absolutely -I think one of the main reasons the amount of winning punters is few is that so many try to swim upstream .....they feel compelled to try and defy the odds rather than let them work in their favor.
A perfect example is you will read on the site people who resent the strike rate of Marcus ,and want to back against him on principle-if you filter Marcus rides,using patterns,you can get his strike rate up to over 40%.
So in certain races you have a 40% chance of backing the winner so why try to find a winner amongst the balance where the other 60% chance is spread over as many as 15 horses, so your chances reduce to less than 5%.
The same principles apply to stables, draws etc ......it is folly trying to catch the exceptions right in a lot if races!

exactly, the punter must put all the odds in his favor any way he finds a gap, the whisperer has obviously found his edge through thousands of hours of study, he deserves all he gets, point is that punters should find ways around trying to rely on stable info, its not all its made out to be, trainers are very busy people with getting their yards fit and keeping an eye on everything, some may find a little time to study and can make a horse a good thing with work etc, but it often goes wrong for them too, they have loyalty to their own horses and sometime overlook factors by being loyal to themselves, we as punters just want to back any winner so in a sense we have an advantage, we also have an edge over the bookie, we can pick our races to bet on, he is forced to participate in every race, the game as it is can not cater for total transparency and I for one think if all connections info is out there we will be in a worse position because connections also get it wrong and we dont want clutter, we want clarity, in the eighties when we formed SARGA we suggested that after the canter down all trainers instructions to the jockey for the race is posted on boards on the course, and now days it can be distributed through the electronic media etc, also its a good reference for the stipes if any questions after the race, lots can be done to assist the punter but the first task is to find someone in administration that has a clue or cares
The following user(s) said Thank You: rob faux

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.117 seconds

Contact Details

Main Office (HQ)
PO Box 40390
Moreleta Park
Pretoria
0044
+27 (0) 82 785 4357
info@africanbettingclan.com

About A.B.C.

African Betting Clan is established for the upliftment of the sports punter, who enjoys a bet on horse racing, football and other sports, enabling them to voice their views and opinions on all aspects of the sport of their choice, free of charge.

Learn More

T's & C's

The views expressed on this website are not necessarily the views held by the proprietors of the site. Therefore African Betting Clan will not be responsible for any content posted. No persons under the age of 18 years are permitted to gamble. National Responsible Gambling Programme and its toll-free number (0800 006 008)